Reverse an array.
data-structures-and-algorithms
.array-reverse
.reverseArray
which takes an array as an argument. Without utilizing any of the built-in methods available to your language, return an array with elements in reversed order.Input | Output |
---|---|
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6] |
[6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1] |
[89, 2354, 3546, 23, 10, -923, 823, -12] |
[-12, 823, -923, 10, 23, 3546, 2354, 89] |
[2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 37, 41, 43, 47, 53, 59, 61, 67, 71, 73, 79, 83, 89, 97, 101, 103, 107, 109, 113, 127, 131, 137, 139, 149, 151, 157, 163, 167, 173, 179, 181, 191, 193, 197, 199] |
[199, 197, 193, 191, 181, 179, 173, 167, 163, 157, 151, 149, 139, 137, 131, 127, 113, 109, 107, 103, 101, 97, 89, 83, 79, 73, 71, 67, 61, 59, 53, 47, 43, 41, 37, 31, 29, 23, 19, 17, 13, 11, 7, 5, 3, 2] |
Utilize the Single-responsibility principle: any methods you write should be clean, reusable, abstract component parts to the whole challenge. You will be given feedback and marked down if you attempt to define a large, complex algorithm in one function definition.
Once you’ve achieved a working solution, implement the same feature with a different methodology. (Hint: what different techniques do you have when working with arrays? Recursion, loops, indexes, modifying the array input directly…)
In other words, use a different algorithm & pseudocode to solve the same problem. Then compare approaches for efficiency, readability, flexibility, etc.
# Reverse an Array
<!-- Description of the challenge -->
## Whiteboard Process
<!-- Embedded whiteboard image -->
## Approach & Efficiency
<!-- What approach did you take? Discuss Why. What is the Big O space/time for this approach? -->
main
branch. Use the description field to describe the work accomplished.main
, and delete your branch (don’t worry, the PR link will still work).Points | Reasoning |
---|---|
3 | Whiteboard exercise completed, recommended process followed, and code appears correct |
2 | Whiteboard exercise completed, and recommended process followed |
1 | Whiteboard exercise is not complete, or workflow does not follow recommended structure/syntax |
0 | Whiteboard exercise is significantly incomplete or not present |
Points | Reasoning |
---|---|
2 | Readme meets all requirements, and the top-level readme of repository properly links to challenge |
0 | Readme not present in repo, incorrectly linked, or does not meet the specified requirements listed in assignment |